As an executive have you asked for an Earned Value Report? As a professionals can you use Earned Value to your advantage? Why #EarnedValueManagement (EVM) is the Quiet Power Behind Smart Project Control. Projects often drift silently: costs escalate, timelines stretch, and scope expands subtly until delivery is compromised. The real risk? Leaders discover it too late. ➡️Why Executives Should Pay Attention EVM is not just a reporting tool — it’s a strategic control mechanism. It empowers you to ask: 🪀Are we generating measurable value for the resources we’re investing? 🪀Are our teams operating with efficiency, or just staying busy? 🪀Are we getting early warnings, or waiting for full-blown project failure? When gut instinct leads, subjectivity rules. When EVM leads, visibility rules. ➡️Three Strategic Questions EVM Answers 1. Planned Value (PV) — What should be done by now? 2. Earned Value (EV) — What has actually been done? 3. Actual Cost (AC) — What have we already spent? This trio helps decode two critical signals: • Cost Performance Index (CPI = EV / AC) Are we using resources efficiently? • Schedule Performance Index (SPI = EV / PV) ➡️Are we on track or drifting? These metrics go beyond noise. They quantify risk, illuminate misalignment, and signal course correction before problems become political or irreparable. 📈 Executive Scenario You greenlit a $1000K, 10-week transformation initiative. At Week 5: • Work planned: 50% (PV = $500K) • Work delivered: 40% (EV = $400K) • Cost incurred: $600K (AC) Reality check: • CPI = 0.67 → You’re overspending • SPI = 0.8 → You’re behind schedule • CV = -$200K → Budget risk • SV = -$100K → Schedule risk It’s no longer about gut feel or anecdotal progress updates. You now have a precise value signal. 💡 Where EVM Belongs Even in agile or hybrid environments where flexibility reigns, EVM plays a strategic role. Use it as: • A sanity check in Agile or T&M contracts • A trend dashboard in ongoing retainers • A performance pulse in fixed-price initiatives • A portfolio-level risk lens for executive sponsors and PMOs It’s not about bureaucracy — it’s about clarity in complexity. When EVM shows everything trending around 1.0, you’ve found the sweet spot: predictability and control. ➡️Why It Matters to You as a Leader EVM turns project reporting into business language: • Not “we are working hard,” but “we are 20% ahead in value generation.” • Not “we are trying our best,” but “we are off-track by $300K and here is the fix.” It is a narrative grounded in data, giving you the ability to intervene strategically, not reactively. EVM does not stop the storm — it gives you radar. Still appreciating the Middle Eastern Culture. A lot of Value Earned!! #FolaElevates
Budget Monitoring In Projects
Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.
-
-
If you benchmark projects on €/kWp, you miss the point. The real metric is €/MWh. In practice, I keep running into the same discussions: How do you compare Project A (say, in Eastern Europe) with Project B (say, in Southern Europe), when grid, construction, O&M or financing have totally different cost profiles? Instead of arguing over individual cost items, there’s a simpler way: look at LCOE (€/MWh). What really matters (short & clear): --> €/kWp = construction indicator, but not a success factor. --> LCOE (€/MWh) captures CAPEX, OPEX, performance (PR/degradation), financing & lifetime. --> A “more expensive” project can deliver cheaper power thanks to higher yield, longer lifetime, or better financing. --> Investors and banks already benchmark on €/MWh, not €/kWp. Number flavor (utility scale, all-in incl. EPC, development, financing): -->Typical Utility Scale DE/CEE (2024): ~560–600 €/kWp all-in -->Project A: 580 €/kWp, PR 80%, WACC 6%, 25 years -> ~49-52 €/MWh -->Project B: 640 €/kWp, PR 87%, WACC 5%, 30 years -> ~40-43 €/MWh --> Same installed capacity, different assumptions –> output beats input. Do you still benchmark projects on €/kWp? Or already on €/MWh? And which 3 variables move your LCOE the most: PR, WACC, O&M, degradation? #AndreasBach #LCOE #SolarPV #ProjectFinance #CleanEnergy
-
How to Control Project Cost I believe this is the moment every project manager must face the truth: projects don’t fail suddenly, they bleed slowly. Cost overruns don’t explode overnight; they grow silently when numbers are ignored, assumptions go unchecked, and discipline fades. Studies show nearly 70% of projects exceed their original budgets, and the average overrun is 28%. That is not a budgeting issue—it is a leadership issue. When you control cost, you control confidence, credibility, and momentum. Cost control is not about saying “no” to spending; it is about saying “yes” to intelligent decisions, backed by data and clarity. The most powerful project managers don’t guess; they measure. Projects that invest time in structured cost planning are 2.5 times more likely to finish within budget. Accurate estimates, realistic contingencies, and clear cost ownership turn chaos into control. When teams know where every dollar is going, decision-making speeds up by 33%, and waste drops sharply. Cost control starts before the first task begins—it starts with mindset, precision, and discipline. High-Quality Project Management Templates & Documents: https://lnkd.in/dCGqF98z Once the project starts, tracking becomes your lifeline. Real-time cost monitoring reduces overruns by 22%, according to industry data. Tools like Earned Value Management give you early warning signals—when CPI drops below 0.9, the project is already in danger. High-performing teams review cost data weekly, not monthly, catching issues while they are still small and fixable. Cost visibility creates certainty, and certainty creates speed. Change is another silent budget killer. Research shows 52% of cost overruns come from uncontrolled scope changes. Strong change control does not slow projects down—it protects them. Every approved change must answer one question clearly: what is the cost impact? Projects with formal change approval processes save an average of 15–20% in total cost. Control does not limit creativity; it directs it. Risk-based cost control separates average managers from elite leaders. Projects that actively quantify cost risks perform 31% better than those that rely on static budgets. When risks are priced early and contingency is planned, surprises lose their power. Add smart procurement strategies, and organizations save another 10–15% through better contracts and vendor alignment. Finally, forecasting turns cost control into foresight. Projects that forecast Estimate at Completion identify problems 2–3 months earlier, giving leaders time to act, not react. Cost control is not cost cutting—it is cost intelligence. And intelligence always wins. 👉 Take control of your projects with High-Quality Project Management Templates & Documents: https://lnkd.in/dCGqF98z #ProjectManagement #CostControl #ProjectCost #PMLeadership #EarnedValue #BudgetManagement #Template22
-
Our Engineers Are Now Paid Bonuses Based on AWS Efficiency The most controversial change my friend has made as CTO: 30% of our engineering bonus structure now ties directly to AWS cost efficiency. The results after just ONE QUARTER: 1. Cloud bill reduced by $237,000/month 2. System performance improved by 41% 3. Deployment frequency unchanged The same features. The same delivery timelines. Dramatically different economics. The uncomfortable truth? No one was optimizing for cloud efficiency because no one was measuring it within our project workflow. Three immediate changes we made: 1. Integrated real-time AWS cost data into Jira 2. Added "cost per transaction" to our definition of done 3. Celebrated cost improvements as loudly as feature launches One senior engineer's confession: "I had no idea my architecture choices were costing us $40K/month in unnecessary spending. Now I can see it in real-time." The most dangerous gap in modern project management isn't between product and engineering—it's between feature development and cloud economics. Is your team building features blind to their operating costs? The answer is likely yes. #EngineeringLeadership #CloudOps #AWSSavings #FeatureEconomics #PMI #PMIChennai
-
Ever wonder how companies actually decide whether an energy-saving project is worth the money? The golden standard is the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) – it’s the single most powerful metric in engineering economics. In simple terms: The IRR tells you the annual return a project generates over its lifetime. If the IRR is higher than your company’s Minimum Attractive Rate of Return (MARR – basically your cost of capital or hurdle rate), the project makes financial sense. The bigger the gap, the better the investment. Other key concepts in play: - Net Present Value (NPV) = 0 at the IRR - Uniform Annual Series (A) – same savings every year - (P/A, i%, n) factor – converts annual amounts to today’s dollars - MARR – the minimum return your company will accept (often 8–15% depending on risk) Now, let’s see this in action with a manufacturing example : Project: Energy Conservation Measure (ECM) - Initial cost: $100,000 - Annual energy savings: $23,400 - Life: 12 years - Company MARR: 12% Using the classic (P/A) factor method: Required factor = 100,000 ÷ 23,400 = 4.2735 From interest tables → this falls between 20% and 21% After interpolation (or Excel IRR function) → IRR = 20.7% That’s nearly 9 percentage points above MARR — an absolute no-brainer. Bottom line: This project doesn’t just pay back… it delivers outstanding returns with a huge safety margin. Check the infographic below for the full step-by-step calculation — perfect if you’re preparing for PE pr CEM exams. #EngineeringEconomy #IRR #EnergyEfficiency #CapitalProjects #Sustainability #Manufacturing #PEexam #EnergyManagement
-
🎯 Mastering Financial Efficiency: Insights from 20+ Years of Strategic Excellence Through my journey as a Project Director and now as a CEO at Techner, I’m often asked: ❓ How do you achieve financial efficiency in complex Telco projects without compromising quality? ❓ What drives consistent cost savings while building trust with clients and teams? We’ve delivered remarkable results in project delivery and financial efficiency by focusing on RFT culture, people, process improvements, and precise tracking systems. Here’s how: 1️⃣ Site Quality and Delivery Efficiency ✅ 90%+ project delivery: Consistently achieving high delivery success rates month after month reinforces reliability. ✅ RFT Culture: Minimising rework and delays by delivering sites Right First Time or Almost-RFT. ✅ Handover Pack (HOP) tracking: Ensuring quality and consistency at every stage keeps timelines and costs under control. ✅ Material delivery tracking: Accurate, timely kit deliveries optimise resources and reduce waste. ✅ Pre-Work & COB Checklist: Comprehensive site preparation and end-of-day reviews maintain delivery standards. 2️⃣ SLA Excellence and Defect Management ✅ Improved SLA metrics: Strong SLA performance reduces penalties and enhances client satisfaction. ✅ Defect dispute success > 40%: Record success in defect disputes has recovered costs and reduced risks. ✅ Efficient defect resolution: Addressing issues early avoids budget and schedule escalations. ✅ H&S Checklist and Quality Audit Checklist: Proactively ensuring compliance and mitigating risks on every site. 3️⃣ Time Management and Financial Tracking ✅ POW vs Actual Time on Site: Aligning Program of Work (POW) with actual time on site ensures workforce efficiency and cost savings. ✅ Real-time financial tracking: Monitoring budgets, especially DM budget, expenses during projects and capturing VRs. ✅ Weekly and Monthly P&L: Regular reviews ensure financial accountability at both project and site levels. ✅ Responsibility Matrix and OTD Tracker: Clear ownership and tracking deliver results within timelines and budgets. ✅ Daily Dependency Calls: Fostering collaboration and resolving blockers promptly keeps projects on track. 🎯 My Takeaway Financial efficiency isn’t about cutting corners—it’s about smarter systems, disciplined processes, and motivated teams. Over the years, we’ve achieved: ✅ Reduced costs: Minimising rework, optimising time, and resolving defects efficiently. ✅ Higher profitability: Better resource use has improved margins without compromising quality. ✅ Stronger client relationships: Financial discipline and reliable delivery build trust and long-term partnerships. Financial efficiency forms the backbone of sustainable growth, driven by quality and innovation. Let’s continue to raise the bar for smarter, sustainable project delivery! #Leadership #FinancialEfficiency #RFTCulture #ProjectDelivery #Techner
-
𝗔𝗿𝗲 𝗬𝗼𝘂 𝗣𝗮𝘆𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗧𝘄𝗶𝗰𝗲 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗬𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗷𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗔𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗥𝗲𝗾𝘂𝗶𝗿𝗲𝘀? Across the energy and infrastructure industries, Front-End Engineering and Design (FEED) studies are meant to guide smart decision-making. What if they are inflating your project costs by more than double? 𝗪𝗲'𝗿𝗲 𝘀𝗲𝗲𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮 𝘁𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗯𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗱. 𝗦𝗼𝗺𝗲 𝗹𝗮𝗿𝗴𝗲 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝗺𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗱𝘂𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗙𝗘𝗘𝗗 𝘀𝘁𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗳𝘆 𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗲𝗱 𝘀𝗼𝗹𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀, 𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗮𝗻𝗶𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗼𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗱: 🚨 Pre-selected vendors with inflated prices 🚨 Over-engineered designs that add unnecessary complexity 🚨 Lack of competitive cost benchmarking 🚨 Procurement models that prioritize firms profiting from their own designs 🚨 Exaggerated risk assessments that push unnecessary spending It is costing companies millions, distorting project economics, and delaying critical investments. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗕𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗜𝗺𝗽𝗮𝗰𝘁: 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁’𝘀 𝗮𝘁 𝗦𝘁𝗮𝗸𝗲? ❌ 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗷𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗗𝗲𝗹𝗮𝘆𝘀 𝗼𝗿 𝗖𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 – Inflated costs make viable projects seem impossible to fund. ❌ 𝗨𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗰𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗮𝗿𝘆 𝗖𝗮𝗽𝗶𝘁𝗮𝗹 𝗘𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗶𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲𝘀 – Companies overpay for infrastructure that could have been built at half the cost. ❌ 𝗟𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗲𝘁𝗶𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗘𝗱𝗴𝗲 – Accepting inflated pricing weakens profitability and operational efficiency. ❌ 𝗠𝗶𝘀𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝗜𝗻𝗻𝗼𝘃𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗢𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗲𝘀 – More cost-effective and scalable solutions are often ignored. 𝗛𝗼𝘄 𝗗𝗼 𝗬𝗼𝘂 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗬𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗕𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀? ✅ Bring in an independent advisor to audit cost assumptions before committing to vendor recommendations. ✅ Demand transparent cost breakdowns to identify inflated line items. ✅ Implement a competitive bidding process rather than accepting pre-selected vendors. ✅ Challenge risk assumptions that drive costs beyond what is reasonable. ✅ Insist on alternative value engineering options to optimize for cost efficiency. ✅ Benchmark costs against real-world projects to verify projections. The Industry is Missing the Shift 𝗘𝘃𝗲𝗻 𝘀𝗼𝗺𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗦𝗠𝗘𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗺𝗶𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗮𝗽𝗶𝗱 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗶𝗻 𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗴𝘆 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗶𝗻𝗳𝗿𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝗱𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗹𝗼𝗽𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁. Many still rely on outdated cost assumptions while the market moves without them. At Legend Energy Advisors, we cut through the inefficiencies, validate cost assumptions, and ensure projects move forward with realistic budgets. not inflated ones. 𝗪𝗼𝗿𝗸 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗮𝗻 𝗘𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗴𝘆 𝗔𝗱𝘃𝗶𝘀𝗼𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘀𝗶𝘁𝘀 𝗼𝗻 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝘀𝗶𝗱𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘁𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲! * * * * * * * * * * 𝗗𝗼𝗻'𝘁 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗴𝘆, 𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗴𝘆 𝗯𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿!™ For energy insights, follow: #EnergyNinjaChronicles ⚡ Subscribe to the newsletter: 📩 https://lnkd.in/dGpq2-dC #EnergyStrategy #Infrastructure #DataCenters #ProjectDevelopment
Explore categories
- Hospitality & Tourism
- Productivity
- Finance
- Soft Skills & Emotional Intelligence
- Education
- Technology
- Leadership
- Ecommerce
- User Experience
- Recruitment & HR
- Customer Experience
- Real Estate
- Marketing
- Sales
- Retail & Merchandising
- Science
- Supply Chain Management
- Future Of Work
- Consulting
- Writing
- Economics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Employee Experience
- Healthcare
- Workplace Trends
- Fundraising
- Networking
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Negotiation
- Communication
- Engineering
- Career
- Business Strategy
- Change Management
- Organizational Culture
- Design
- Innovation
- Event Planning
- Training & Development