Corporate Bankruptcy Financing Options

Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.

  • View profile for Chetan Ahuja

    Helping founders raise non-dilutive capital | Co-founder at Debtworks

    29,521 followers

    The government just doubled startup loan guarantees to ₹20 crore with no collateral required. But 90% of founders won't access it for these 5 reasons. While most startups are busy chasing VCs and giving away massive equity chunks, the government quietly enhanced the Credit Guarantee Scheme for Startups (CGSS) in the 2025 budget. The changes are significant: ⤷ Guarantee limit doubled from ₹10 crore to ₹20 crore ⤷ Guarantee fee reduced to just 1% for 27 strategic sectors ⤷ Still ZERO collateral required ⤷ Coverage of 65-80% of the loan amount This is not just another government scheme. It's a game-changer for smart founders. If you wonder why it matters? Each 10% of equity you save in early rounds compounds to 2-3x more founder ownership at exit. Just a sample breakdown of what I mean looks like this [1] Startup raises ₹10 crore equity at ₹50 crore valuation = 20% dilution [2] Alternative: ₹7 crore equity + ₹3 crore CGSS loan = 14% dilution [3] Difference: 6% equity saved [4] At a ₹500 crore exit, that's ₹30 crore more in founder pockets Yet 90% of founders won't access this opportunity. Here's why ↓ 1. Startup Mindset Problem → Obsession with VC funding as validation → "Debt is for traditional businesses" mentality → Fear of repayment obligations 2. Awareness Gap → Most don't even know this scheme exists → Fewer understand how to actually access it → Information largely stuck in government websites 3. Wrong Approach to Banks → Pitching like it's a VC meeting (completely wrong approach) → Not preparing bank-specific documentation → Approaching the wrong banks/branches 4. Poor Documentation → Missing key elements banks require → Unrealistic financial projections → Insufficient evidence of repayment capacity 5. Wrong Stage Application → Too early (pre-revenue or minimal traction) → Team gaps that create risk perception → Unclear use of funds with measurable outcomes So who actually qualifies for this funding? The IDEAL candidates have  ⤷ 6-12+ months of revenue history ⤷ Clear unit economics with path to profitability ⤷ DPIIT recognition ⤷ Strong founding team with domain expertise ⤷ Clear use of funds with ROI metrics ⤷ Previous smaller loans successfully repaid (even personal) The optimal startup capital structure isn't all equity or all debt - it's a strategic mix. In the US, founders typically use 30-40% debt in their growth phase. In India, it's under 10%. This presents a massive arbitrage opportunity for founders who think differently. Don't wait - early movers have the advantage as banks are more receptive now before applicant numbers surge. #StartupFunding #DebtFinancing #CGSS #GovernmentSchemes

  • View profile for Abhishek Vvyas

    Driving customer acquisition and market planning at MHS

    29,747 followers

    India Doubles Credit Guarantee for Startups, From ₹10 Cr to ₹20 Cr. This is not just a headline. It's a game-changer for every founder chasing scale with limited capital. I believe the recent expansion of the Credit Guarantee Scheme for Startups (CGSS) is not just a policy update, it’s a much-needed confidence signal for innovation-led businesses in India. The revised CGSS framework, notified by the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT), is a strategic step toward reducing lending friction for early-stage ventures. Here are the key updates that matter: ✅ The maximum credit guarantee cover per borrower has been doubled from ₹10 crore to ₹20 crore. ✅ For loans up to ₹10 crore, the guarantee cover is now 85% of the defaulted amount. ✅ For loans beyond ₹10 crore, the cover is 75%. ✅ Eligible lending institutions include Scheduled Commercial Banks, SEBI-registered Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs), and well-rated NBFCs with ₹100 crore net worth or more. ✅ The scheme supports various instruments, including venture debt, working capital, debentures, mezzanine debt, and more, allowing founders to structure their funding based on their growth needs. This is not just financial support. It is structural encouragement. By de-risking lenders and increasing credit accessibility, the scheme allows capital to flow more freely toward promising but unproven innovations, particularly those outside Tier-1 ecosystems. India’s next decade of entrepreneurship depends on three things: - Accessible capital at early stages - Strong mentoring and execution support - Policy frameworks that evolve with founders’ realities Why this matters: - It reduces perceived risk for lenders, opening new capital routes for early-stage businesses - It supports non-traditional funding instruments that startups increasingly rely on - It signals the government's commitment to innovation beyond metros and big-ticket ventures In a capital-starved landscape, this expansion gives India’s creators, builders, and problem-solvers a stronger financial runway. However, the real challenge now lies in execution. Startups must ensure they’re eligible, lenders must align incentives, and advisors must bridge knowledge gaps so this capital reaches where it’s needed most. Because when policy, finance, and founder intent move together, ecosystems thrive. #entrepreneurship #startups #innovation

  • View profile for Dang Vu

    Senior Associate at Allens | Banking & Project Finance, Capital Markets (Bonds), M&A, and Renewable Energy | Chevening (UK, FCO) Awards Alumni

    9,867 followers

    𝗜𝗦𝗦𝗨𝗘 𝟮𝟭: 𝗪𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗚𝘂𝗮𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗲‑𝗕𝗮𝗰𝗸𝗲𝗱 𝗙𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗕𝗲 𝗮 𝗡𝗼‑𝗕𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗿 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗡𝗲𝘅𝘁 𝟯–𝟱 𝗬𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘀? Over the past two years, we have witnessed a significant exit wave — an inevitable phase in any investment cycle. As a new cycle begins to take shape, Vietnam appears well‑positioned, particularly as the country moves toward emerging market recognition and the Government signals strong determination to double GDP growth over the next five years. That said, recent exits have also raised critical questions around legal risk, structured security, and enforcement efficiency in Vietnam. For both new investors and existing investors who have experienced challenges in divestment and asset enforcement, guarantee‑backed financing structures are increasingly coming into focus. (1) SBLC‑Backed Foreign Loans Under this structure, a foreign loan is secured by a Standby Letter of Credit (SBLC) issued by a Vietnamese bank. The SBLC itself is typically backed by security over the borrower’s onshore assets, such as cash or immovable property. This structure has gained strong traction in recent years because it allows the foreign lender to take credit risk on the local bank rather than the borrower. Instead of assessing the enforceability of multiple types of collateral — which often depends on asset liquidity and borrower cooperation — the lender can call on the bank guarantee through a simple demand, without proof of default. In this context, a guarantee issued by a Big 4 Vietnamese bank significantly reduces performance risk and can also support a larger single‑borrower limit. (2) Cross‑Border Guarantees by ECAs / DFIs This structure follows a more traditional trade finance model, typically implemented by Export Credit Agencies (ECAs) or Development Finance Institutions (DFIs). Under this arrangement, ECAs/DFIs provide a 100% payment default guarantee to support a Vietnamese issuer’s VND‑denominated bond issuance, which is usually subscribed by insurers and commercial banks. In parallel, ECAs/DFIs take security over the issuer’s assets and may also obtain a counter‑guarantee from a Big 4 Vietnamese bank to further manage risk exposure. The growing use of this structure is widely seen as a lifebuoy for the project finance market, which was severely impacted by recent changes in the FITs regime. Notably, it has helped restore bankability for renewable energy projects — particularly rooftop solar — by enabling long‑term tenors of 7–15 years. Disclaimer as usual.

  • The RBI (Reserve Bank of India) First Loss Default Guarantee (FLDG) policy refers to a risk-sharing arrangement where a third party, typically a fintech company or a Non-Banking Financial Company (NBFC), provides a guarantee to cover a portion of the first loss incurred in a loan portfolio. Here are the key aspects: 1. **Risk Sharing:** Under the FLDG arrangement, the third party (guarantor) agrees to absorb the initial losses up to a specified limit, typically a percentage of the loan portfolio. This mitigates the lender’s risk. 2. **Encouraging Lending:** By reducing the lender's risk, the FLDG policy encourages banks and financial institutions to extend credit to borrowers who might otherwise be deemed too risky. 3. **Operational Mechanism:** In case of a default, the guarantor compensates the lender for the agreed percentage of the defaulted amount, up to the pre-defined limit. 4. **Regulatory Oversight:** The RBI regulates these arrangements to ensure financial stability and protect the interests of all parties involved. Specific guidelines may be issued to manage the risk and transparency of such guarantees. 5. **Fintech Involvement:** FLDG arrangements are common in partnerships between banks and fintech companies, where the latter often take on the first loss guarantee to facilitate lending to underserved or new customer segments. The FLDG policy aims to foster innovation and financial inclusion by leveraging the strengths of both traditional financial institutions and new-age fintech companies. #RBI #FLDG

  • View profile for Ryan Kroge, MBA, MSF

    Nationwide M&A/CRE Lender. Top SBA Loan Producer for over 25 years 🔨 (248) 302-4032 Rkroge@MilestoneBank.com

    4,314 followers

    Did the SBA just make it easier for lenders to say yes to manufacturers without making your client any more bankable? Let me ask you something. The SBA just rolled out the "Made in America Loan Guarantee." 90% government backing. Fee waivers up to $950K. NAICS 31-33 gets the red carpet treatment. Sounds incredible, right? Here's what every broker is telling their manufacturing clients right now: "This is a once in a generation opportunity." "Lenders only have 10% risk now, they'll approve anything." "The government is literally paying banks to fund your deal." But here's what's actually happening on my desk. The same manufacturers who couldn't cash flow a deal at 75% guarantee still can't cash flow it at 90%. The guarantee changed. The borrower didn't. You know what a 90% guarantee does? It makes the lender more comfortable. It does absolutely nothing for the borrower's balance sheet. That manufacturer with thin margins and $2M in aging equipment? The one who's been grinding through unpredictable cash cycles for the last decade? The SBA didn't fix his P&L. They fixed the bank's exposure. A guarantee is not an approval. The underwriting still has to work. The debt service coverage still has to hit. The deal still has to make sense on paper and in practice. I've been watching this industry long enough to know what comes next: Lenders rushing to market this like it's free money. Brokers stacking pipelines with deals that won't close. Borrowers getting their hopes up before anyone runs the numbers. We've seen this movie before. I was doing SBA lending when they loosened things up and then had to pull it all back because people were abusing the program. The cycle repeats. They tighten, they loosen, everybody gets excited, and then reality sets in. The 90% guarantee is a tool. A good one. But a tool only works when the fundamentals are already there. If your manufacturing client has strong cash flow, clean financials, and a real growth plan, this program is going to be a monster for them. Absolutely take advantage of it. But if you're hoping a higher guarantee percentage is going to save a weak deal, you're setting your client up for a decline and yourself up for a wasted quarter. Run the numbers first. Then get excited.

  • View profile for Pradeep Kurukulasuriya

    Executive Secretary, United Nations Capital Development Fund (UNCDF) 🇺🇳 | Catalytic Capital for Frontier Markets | Aligning Development Finance with Private Investment for Inclusive Growth

    9,369 followers

    What if we could reuse precious public funding? That's what United Nations Capital Development Fund (UNCDF) is doing with guarantees.     In Papua New Guinea, women entrepreneurs have long been excluded from formal finance. Not because their businesses aren’t viable, but because they lack credit history or formal documentation. Through a UNCDF-supported portfolio guarantee facility launched in July 2025 with Women’s Microbank Limited (Mama Bank), in partnership with UNDP under the GFCR initiative, access to finance for women-led and blue economy MSMEs in Papua New Guinea is beginning to expand. By de-risking lending for the bank, UNCDF absorbs early-stage risk so more women can get a loan from Mama Bank to grow their businesses. What looks like a small loan on paper can mean new equipment, new jobs, and access to larger markets. For Port Mosbey’s Ms. Lucy, a loan of about $11,000 from Mama Bank enabled her to invest in her hardware shop, making a mark in a typically male-dominated industry. As these loans are repaid, the same capital can be recycled and redeployed to support the next entrepreneur. This is one way UNCDF is making precious dollars work harder: by providing the guarantee for Mama Bank to continue lending. This is what #catalyticfinance looks like in practice: making investment in early-stage and last-mile markets possible. We go first so greater flows of capital can follow. As a non-credit-rated entity, UNCDF fulfills a unique role within the broader UN system. We can take on this early risk, unlocking opportunities where traditional finance doesn't reach, and laying the groundwork for multilateral banks, financial development institutions, and private capital to enter. #developmentfinance #SpringMeetings #SDGs #blendedfinance

  • View profile for Arpit Mutha

    CA (AIR 18) | Private Credit | JPMorgan Chase & Co. | ISB - MDP

    6,309 followers

    ₹20,000 Cr guarantee for small loans - Bailout or necessity? At first glance, it feels like support for lenders. But this is actually about fixing a broken credit cycle. What went wrong? Post-COVID → Consumption boom Especially in rural & semi-urban India MFIs & Small Finance Banks went all-in: • Unsecured / lightly secured loans • Ticket sizes as low as ₹10–20k • Group lending (JLG/SHG models) • NIMs touching 14–17% AUM grew fast. Profits looked great. But micro loans don’t default early. Stress shows up later. And it did. Then came the trigger The Reserve Bank of India stepped in (Nov’23): • Higher risk weights (125%) on unsecured retail loans • Tighter grip on borrower leverage Result? • Delinquencies shot up • Provisions surged • Profits vanished • Stocks corrected sharply Many MFIs started bleeding, showing massive quarterly losses. Many lenders pulled back. Some struggled to raise capital. So… just stop lending? Not that simple. Because: • Millions of borrowers still depend on these loans • Most don’t have a credit score • Banks also need this segment for PSL compliance So, You can’t ignore this cohort. But you also can’t repeat the same mistakes. That’s why this guarantee matters Government is basically saying: “Lend, but we’ll share the risk.” This: • Revives credit flow • Protects lenders’ downside • Keeps the inclusion story alive What needs to change now? If this becomes another easy credit cycle, we’ll be back here again. The real fix is: • Better borrower tracking (PAN/Aadhaar linked) • Controlled leverage • Smarter underwriting (not just growth chasing) • Loans at economical rates Bottom line India’s small borrower is too important to ignore But too risky to lend blindly This guarantee is not a solution It’s a second chance Let’s see if the industry uses it well.

  • View profile for Aastha Aggarwal

    Chief Financial Officer | Company Valuation, Fundraising,Investment Advisor, stock market trader. Investing strategies got featured in ET WEALTH. I simplify investment methodologies . To make people financially literate.

    6,144 followers

    💁♀️For years, one of the biggest challenges for startups has been access to capital without giving away too much equity. A new push through the Credit Guarantee Scheme for Startups (CGSS) could start changing that. 🚀 🔺Here’s what makes this initiative interesting: ☑️First, it tackles the collateral problem. Most startups simply don’t have assets to pledge, which makes traditional bank loans difficult. With government-backed credit guarantees under CGSS, lenders can now extend term loans, working capital, and venture debt with much lower risk. ☑️Second, the lending ecosystem is widening. Startups can access financing through public sector banks like SBI, PNB, and Bank of Baroda, private banks such as HDFC Bank, IDFC First, and Yes Bank, as well as NBFCs and SEBI-registered AIFs. There’s also a clear effort to make financing more inclusive and sector-focused:• Standard guarantee fee: 2% p.a.• Women entrepreneurs & Northeast startups: 1.5% p.a.• Manufacturing & champion sectors: 1% p.a. And perhaps the biggest update ,the credit guarantee limit has now doubled from ₹10 Cr to ₹20 Cr.The coverage structure is also supportive:• 85% guarantee cover up to ₹10 Cr• 75% cover beyond ₹10 Cr Another welcome change is the fully digital process through the Jan Samarth portal, where startups can discover schemes, apply, and track progress in one place. 🔴What does this mean in practice? Startups could potentially raise up to ₹20 Cr without collateral, scale their operations, and reduce heavy equity dilution in early stages. In many ways, this signals a shift, from purely subsidy-based support to credit-backed growth for startups. If implemented well, this could quietly become one of the most important financing tools for India’s startup ecosystem. Curious to hear from founders and investors here : Do you see venture debt and credit guarantees playing a bigger role in startup funding going forward?

  • View profile for Dr. Mohammad Mustafa

    Strategic Finance Leader | Ex-SIDBI, NHB & CERSAI | Expert in Microfinance, Policy, Governance & Regulation | Driving Economic Growth & Sustainable Development , infrastructure and urban finance

    6,106 followers

    🚀 𝗜𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗮’𝘀 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗿𝘁𝘂𝗽 𝗲𝗰𝗼𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺 is massive — 100,000+ registered startups, 100+ unicorns — but one critical gap remains: financing instruments beyond equity. 👉 Today, 85%+ of startup funding is equity-led. This forces early dilution and leaves many promising founders outside VC hubs with no real access to growth capital. The government’s Credit Guarantee Scheme for Startups (CGSS), run by NCGTC, is a strong start. For the first time, venture debt and mezzanine instruments can be backed by sovereign guarantees — reducing collateral burden and diversifying funding options. But we need to go further. India should evolve this into a national Startup Credit & Risk Capital Guarantee Framework — our version of CGTMSE for startups. Such a framework could: ✅ Expand coverage to revenue-based financing, invoice discounting, IP-backed lending, procurement receivable guarantees. ✅ Bring fintech lenders, invoice platforms & DFIs alongside banks, NBFCs & AIFs. ✅ Offer layered coverage from ₹50 lakh to ₹50 crore, so both early-stage and scale-up startups benefit. Global models — Israel’s Yozma, Korea’s KOTEC, US SBA 7(a) — prove that when governments share downside risk, private capital flows with confidence. India has the blueprint. Now is the time to scale CGSS into a flagship program to anchor debt + quasi-equity financing, reduce dependence on foreign VC equity, and empower founders nationwide. 💡 𝗘𝗾𝘂𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗮𝗹𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗰𝗮𝗻𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗰𝗮𝗿𝗿𝘆 𝗜𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗮’𝘀 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗿𝘁𝘂𝗽 𝗱𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗺. 𝗖𝗿𝗲𝗱𝗶𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗸 𝗰𝗮𝗽𝗶𝘁𝗮𝗹 𝗺𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗹𝗼𝗮𝗱. #Startups #VentureDebt #Entrepreneurship #Policy #Innovation #India #NCGTC #CGSS #EY #FinancialInclusion #FutureofFinance

  • View profile for Wassim Malik

    Angel Investor

    14,871 followers

    💡 Inside an Investor’s Funding Rolodex: Grant & Loan Providers I Trust 🎯 European Innovation Council Accelerator • grants up to €2.5 M + equity up to €15 M • ideal for deep‑tech teams with clear impact plans 📑 Horizon Europe RIA & IA • collaborative R&D grants €3 M–€10 M+ • partner with universities or industry leaders for stronger consortia 🏦 InnovFin SME Guarantee Facility (EIB‑backed) • loan guarantees up to 50 % on €25 000–€7.5 M financing • lower interest rates and better terms 🌱 Innovation Fund • grants cover up to 60 % of eligible costs for large‑scale clean energy projects • pair with national agencies like the Swedish Energy Agency for co‑funding 🇸🇪 Vinnova • feasibility grants up to SEK 500 000 • innovation project grants up to SEK 10 M • fast open calls, strong on sustainability metrics 💸 Almi • loans from SEK 50,000 to SEK 5 M at below‑market rates • local coaching to turn pilots into scale‑ups 🇫🇮 Business Finland • R&D grants up to 50 % + innovation loans up to €2 M • expert reviews and export market introductions 🇬🇷 Hellenic Development Bank • loans €50 000–€1 M + 80 % guarantee cover • digital platform for green transition schemes 🌍 EASME (COSME & LIFE programmes) • COSME guarantees on €25 000–€1.5 M loans • LIFE grants for environment & climate action pilots ⚡ EIT Climate‑KIC • combined grants, coaching & investor matchmaking • rapid follow‑on funding & corporate pilots 🔌 EIT InnoEnergy • equity investments + grants up to €100 000 • access to utilities & corporate partners 🚀 Fast Track to Innovation (Horizon Europe) • close‑to‑market grants up to €3 M at 70 % funding • accelerated timelines, clear market readiness 🇫🇷 Bpifrance (France) • innovation grants & soft loans up to €3 M • equity co‑investment in high‑potential scale‑ups 🇬🇧 Innovate UK • grant competitions up to £2 M for UK‑based R\&D • access to KTN networks and industry experts 🇪🇸 CDTI (Spain) • aid for tech projects: grants, repayable advances & soft loans • strong on international R&D partnerships 🇩🇪 KfW (Germany) • start‑up loans up to €25 M at subsidised rates • green financing for energy and climate ventures Founder Tips to Navigate Grants & Loans • align programmes with your tech readiness and reporting capacity • build clear impact metrics and stakeholder support • plan applications months in advance, allowing time for feedback • focus on quality over quantity, target two programmes max #startupfunding #grantwriting #non‑dilutivecapital #loans #EUfunding #innovation #cleantech #deeptech #founderjourney #investorinsight

Explore categories